Analyzing the credibility of different sources of evidence

Document 1 was written by Benjamin from Tudela, who describes what he sees and experiences as a traveler throughout the city of Constantinople. After reading all of the different evidences provided in this chapter, this document was the most credible because it is not biased at all, unlike most of the others. It is merely a collection of the author’s observations. It had a more impartial outlook than the other passages. I think that he wrote this as either a journal entry or it was part of some sort of diary.

Document 2 was written by Robert of Clari who makes it quite evident that he is a supporter of Constantinople and repeatedly advocates the city and its positive attributions. It talks about the extravagant palaces, riches, and churches that Constantinople has and the beauty of the city. I think that the author meant this document to be as another entry in a journal that a normal tourist would have kept and written in habitually.

Document 3 is written by Nicetas Chroniates who writes about the Latin’s new method of plundering Constantinople with a series of historical recordings what had occurred. It is very obvious that Chroniates did not have an affinity for these Latin people and looked down upon them. I think he probably wrote this passage for a rival, adversary, or enemy of the Latin people or just as a historical recollection that consisted of a biased point of view.

Document 4 portrays an illustrated map of Constantinople and how the magnificent city was enclosed by a wall that served as a protective barrier. I think that it was used not only as a map which showed off Constantinople’s wealth and beauty, but also as a way for other people to know where, in relation to other societies, this city was located and ways to make routes to get there or leave there.

Document 5 is a picture that depicts the interior of Saint Sophia, which is a beautiful, elegant, well-built, and decorated building. I think that is purpose was to be a beautiful work of art that exemplified the beauty or ornate structure of the church.

Document 6 was written by George Acropolites and it discussed the Thanksgiving celebration and religious holidays/traditions of Constantinople. I think it could have possibly just been written in a journal or diary as a way to describe the impact religion had on this particular society.

Document 7 was written by Chrysobull who talked about the trade that occurred between Constantinople and other cities. It displays a positive opinion on Constantinople because it portrays the city as very munificent to other societies. I think that the author was definitely from Constantinople and was advocating the city and its trade as a way to tune in the public to the successfulness of this city’s interactions with others.